News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by slashdev on Friday July 14, 2023 @08:48AM (#36723184)
The power plants are a lot more efficient, but it does require converting the electric grid over to renewables and nuclear. Natural gas is cleaner, but it’s a stop on the way to the destination, not the destination. We will also achieve that, because quite frankly, we have no choice in the matter.

Walkways, bike paths, and public transit are great things. I wish they did more of that where I live. I’d rather not use cars when I have the option. But they will never be the solution. They should be a part of the solution.

Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by calaphos on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:06AM (#36723404)
Modern Thermal power plants reached Thermal efficenies of 45-50% for coal and closed cycle gas turbines. ICE cars have a hard time reaching 25% under normal conditions. Additionally burning methane has lower CO2 emissions than gasoline and a third of the US grid is produced from carbon free sources anyway.
Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by JackSlateur on Friday July 14, 2023 @08:59AM (#36723327)
Electricity transportation is not efficient Recycling EV stuff is also terrible

Funny fact: here in france, in 2019 (so pre-covid), automobile were responsible for 10% of the petroleum consumption on the main land

10%, yes, just 10% (source: https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2119673)

The project to replace all cars by EV cars is a fraud. I'm sure not everybody will lose in that project. But don't worry : in the best case (which we know will never be anything but theory and dream), we will resolve 10% of the initial problem. Awesome!

Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by schiffern on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:10AM (#36723461)

  >10%, yes, just 10%
8.9/67.2 = 13%, not 10%

Also you forgot to include "Gazole" (untaxed diesel fuel for off-road use), which makes up a whopping 46% of all petroleum use in France.

As for the "scam," there is none. Nobody's claiming EVs can solve the entire sustainability problem all by themselves. That would be oversimplified, "Silver Bullet" thinking.

EVs are just one part of a complete sustainable economy. 'Necessary, but not sufficient.'

[edited to remove a faulty statistic from a tangent]

Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by JeanMarcS on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:21AM (#36723623)
I don't understand where you get those number from.

In the first paragraph of your link :

> In 2020, nuclear power made up the largest portion of electricity generation, at around 78%.[2] Renewables accounted for 19.1% of energy consumption.

Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by orwin on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:17AM (#36723564)
19% from renewables and 78% from nuclear from what i read, so you're off by an order of magnitude here.
Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by JackSlateur on Friday July 14, 2023 @11:25AM (#36725350)
So it is far more interesting to focus on bus, trucks and tractors (the "gazole" line) than cars (the "automobile" line)

As far as I know, those are not concerned by the great EV replacement

Re:Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream by orwin on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:15AM (#36723539)
So for people that can't read French or statistics:

"Carburants pour automobile¹" mean unleaded, and yes, 8.5/72.7 is .11 of the total petroleum consumption.

"Gazole" however mean diesel, and is 32.8/72.7 so .45 of the total petroleum consumption. Including buses, tractors and trucks btw.