You're confusing me with someone else. Do you see the irony in complaining about unconstructive comments with a reply that is so obviously wrong and unrelated to the parent? Awful tone and childish argumentation to boot.

My mistake, it is the case that you are the one that defended the learning value of the person bragging about money laundering in the ebook thread.

Out of curiosity, what did you learn?

You're almost there: the parent didn't describe money laundering, they described a legal conversion. It's your prerogative to reflexively interpret privacy concerns as criminality, but it isn't useful for a constructive discussion.

I learnt that Cryto ATM withdrawal limits have grown significantly in the last few years.

It’s a bit of a shame that you’re primarily interested in my posting style, not payment processing, crypto or the publishing industry.

As a fun observation, when you see someone discussing something inane like buying ebooks, it’s actually pretty odd for a stranger to hop in and volunteer details about how much money they have and to brag about how they knowingly pay a premium to avoid KYC when handling cash.

For example, if a stranger walked up to you on the street and interrupted your conversation with “I totally know a guy that’ll take any amount of cash you’ve got and give you untraceable crypto or vice versa, no questions asked” without volunteering any other information, you’d be better off being suspicious of him rather than the person being skeptical of that guy.

If you think GP is talking about “Bitcoin ATMs”, can you point me to one that will dispense $10,000 cash from USDT, not Bitcoin without any KYC?

But please go on with your critique.

Nah I'm good, I tried to get my point across. You don't seem to be able to engage with what I'm saying.