Re:Celsius Was Lying
by malfist on Thursday July 13, 2023 @03:22PM
(#36714687)
I'm partial to rankine myself.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Réaumur gets very little mention these days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9aumur_scale
(I'd like to know what these guys were thinking when it came to deciding on the number associated with the boiling point of water, though. 60 and 80?)
Re:Celsius Was Lying
by The_Colonel on Thursday July 13, 2023 @04:23PM
(#36715437)
60 is a pretty useful base with many factors. Not sure if that is a very useful property for expressing temperature, but it's not a completely random number either.
Re:Celsius Was Lying
by hospitalJail on Thursday July 13, 2023 @04:21PM
(#36715413)
I worked in a factory that didn't have decimal points on the thermostat for the ovens.
It was sooo much harder to make foam in Canada than in the US as a result.
I know that is an ancient problem, but this was only a decade ago....
Kind of blows my mind the rest of the world doesnt use decimals when talking about the weather.
Re:Celsius Was Lying
by earthboundkid on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:49AM
(#36724009)
The problem with Celsius is that nice weather in Fahrenheit is 70 to 80, but in Celsius it's only 20 to 25. 5 degrees is too narrow to talk about the difference between a little too cool and a little too hot!
For cooking in ovens or whatever, it's fine because you're up at 350/175 or 500/250. Once you're up that high, precision doesn't matter.