News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by londons_explore on Thursday July 13, 2023 @09:57AM (#36709240)
> surely everyone can now agree Musk's [...] treatment of the platform has rendered it completely useless [...].

I haven't actually noticed much change there. Sure, people seem to be angry about all kinds of things, but that's the normal over on twitter. The core functionality of 'post tweet' and 'see tweets others have posted' seems unaffected for me and every user I follow.

I don't really see what everyone is angry about. "User XYZ did X controversial action and got banned for it" is of no interest to me, partly because I am not interested in User XYZ, and partly because the sorts of things I use twitter for don't revolve around seeing the spread of whatever the next activist thing is.

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by nwienert on Thursday July 13, 2023 @10:29AM (#36709694)
He changed political teams. That turned many here against him. It also turned 98% of media against him, which has managed to drive a bunch of narratives.

If you didn't swallow media narratives wholesale and were just using Twitter you'd have noticed very little.

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by mynameisvlad on Thursday July 13, 2023 @10:29AM (#36709688)
Did you even bother to read the article? The one which describes exactly what the problem is?

Just because you haven’t hit the limit does not mean the limit does not exist nor that it’s harming the platform.

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by londons_explore on Thursday July 13, 2023 @03:03PM (#36714396)
I kinda like there being a limit. I don't follow a user to be able to spam me with a million tweets.

If you have more than ~10 things to say in a day, then sign up for another account and put links - ie. "CaliGov: wildfires around San Francisco. For more info follow @CaliWildfires2023".

Obviously there should be some UI to show you when you're getting near the limit, but I expect thats coming.

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by mynameisvlad on Thursday July 13, 2023 @03:54PM (#36715088)
> I don't follow a user to be able to spam me with a million tweets.

Sure, but this is not your run-of-the-mill user. This is essentially an emergency broadcast service. Most people would follow the account with the desire to see "a million tweets" if those are relevant to the thing they are broadcasting. In fact, the absence of such tweets due to a limit is probably more harmful than the number of tweets that did go out.

> If you have more than ~10 things to say in a day, then sign up for another account and put links - ie. "CaliGov: wildfires around San Francisco. For more info follow @CaliWildfires2023".

That's absurd and spammy for no reason other than to get around a restriction that shouldn't exist for these accounts. And would hit the exact same limits. It's not like they used up their tweets spamming about irrelevant details.

> Obviously there should be some UI to show you when you're getting near the limit, but I expect thats coming.

That's putting a lot of hope into promises that haven't even been made.

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by Liquid_Snake on Thursday July 13, 2023 @10:20PM (#36718692)
you haven't noticed the effect of any dullard getting signal boosted by simply paying $8 an hour? that's a massive change to content proliferation.