Intel is quitting on NUC computers

Re:Intel is quitting on NUC computers by solardev on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @05:09PM (#36687250)

The Mac Minis are a great value compared to the rest of Apple's lineups. The NUC is overpriced, like why would I get that instead of a generic laptop? It was just a poor value for what it offered.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel is quitting on NUC computers by adrian_b on Wednesday July 12, 2023 @03:16AM (#36691352)

A generic laptop has much less peripheral ports and also slower peripheral ports and a much slower CPU.

There are a lot of users who need many other peripherals besides keyboard and mouse and who prefer to not use a ton of dongles. Sometimes no dongle can help with a laptop, because the aggregate throughput of all its USB ports is just too small.

A NUC is much faster than a generic laptop which uses the same CPU, because it has much better cooling. In all recent 0.5 L NUCs the CPU can dissipate 35 W forever without overheating.

No generic laptop can do that. There are plenty of gaming laptops or mobile workstations that can match or exceed the speed of a NUC, but those cost between two and eight times more than a NUC, so a NUC or a similar SFF computer is a much better value than such a laptop and even together with a portable monitor and a compact keyboard it is easier to carry in a backpack than a big and heavy laptop. I have done this for years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel is quitting on NUC computers by solardev on Wednesday July 12, 2023 @02:28PM (#36699451)

Thanks, that is a useful differentiation: laptops for portability and "good enough" for office work, NUCs and small form factor computers for performance in a limited space.

[ Parent | on HN ]