News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on C++23: The Next C++ Standard. Parent comment

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by Etherlord87 on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @03:51PM (#36686400)
I think in this context what's important is if these functions are overloaded or not…
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by pjmlp on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @04:30PM (#36686823)
Which in any case also means the only way to be sure is to track down the implementation, the actual character set hardly makes a difference.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by enriquto on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @04:51PM (#36687051)
I agree. Function overloading is just as bad as operator overloading.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by pjmlp on Wednesday July 12, 2023 @02:33AM (#36691087)
You still need to validate if the implementation matches the name, no matter what.
[ Parent | on HN ]