News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue of Data Provenance. Parent comment

Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by soligern on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:32PM (#36685299)
If reproducible results are the concern, the entire field of psychology should be thrown in the trash. Something like 70% of published papers are irreproducible and serve to push an agenda. “Subjective science” in general belongs in the shitter.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by beepbooptheory on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @05:07PM (#36687230)
What is the agenda?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by soligern on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @07:37PM (#36688615)
There’s no set agenda, I generally referring to people that want to validate/cement their opinions as fact.
[ Parent | on HN ]