News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue of Data Provenance.

Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by faitswulff on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:04PM (#36684825)
Can anyone give a summary or a source for the “Dan Ariely saga” mentioned in the article?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by stainablesteel on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:41PM (#36685427)
this relates to the headline that went around saying "person who studies dishonesty found to be dishonest"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by hdesh on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:24PM (#36685203)
https://datacolada.org/109
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by readthenotes1 on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:09PM (#36684914)
Yet another case where Scientists failed to do Science.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by renewiltord on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:13PM (#36685003)
I have found that Bing AI usually does well with questions such as yours, if you'd like a tool that can help.

I don't mean that in a LMGTFY way, just in a "here's a tool that can help".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by zdragnar on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @03:30PM (#36686115)
What more ironic suggestion could someone hope for on the topic of irreproducible results and fabricated data?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:UCLA Professor Refuses to Cover for Dan Ariely in Issue o... by renewiltord on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @05:50PM (#36687726)
It's a good meme, sir, but the thing does work.
[ Parent | on HN ]