C++23: The Next C++ Standard

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by Longhanks on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:04PM (#36683907)

If people don’t have time to keep up with a languages updates (which, in case of C++, is currently _once_ every three years), then they don’t have time to complain about the lack of features, either. This one had the time to complain and just didn’t want to bother typing "c++ string formatting", which would have been fewer keystrokes than the comment complaining.

On DuckDuckGo, the very first result for "c++ string formatting" is the exact thing this person was complaining about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by nuxi on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:34PM (#36684398)

OP asked about “f-strings like python has”, which is different from plain std::format().

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by psychphysic on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:32PM (#36684363)

But then he'd have missed out on your conversational effervescence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by JonChesterfield on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @08:23PM (#36688931)

Google finds https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62781161/is-it-possible-... which is a portal to horrors with the answer "no"

[ Parent | on HN ]