Which JavaScript property names can be unquoted? When can dot notation be used?

Re:Which JavaScript property names can be unquoted? When can... by mathias on Monday March 05, 2012 @10:46AM (#3666873)

The ECMAScript spec states that engines are free to choose which Unicode version they support, and that Unicode 3.0 is considered to be the lowest common denominator.

Old IEs use an outdated Unicode version (I’d guess Unicode 3.0) to determine whether a given string is a valid identifier name. When using the Unicode 6.1.0 database, much more identifier names are allowed. (More on that here: http://mathiasbynens.be/notes/javascript-identifiers & http://mothereff.in/js-variables.)

Could that be what you’re referring to? Can you give a concrete example of a property name that should be allowed, but fails to work in old IE?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Which JavaScript property names can be unquoted? When can... by simcop2387 on Monday March 05, 2012 @11:28AM (#3667044)

Possbily, I'll try to dig up something from my old projects. I wouldn't be surprised if I seem to be misinformed about it a little.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Which JavaScript property names can be unquoted? When can... by mathias on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @02:16AM (#3670035)

You may have been thinking of ES3, which disallowed the use of unquoted reserved words as property names. So yeah, quoting is still a good idea, especially if backwards compatibility is a concern.

[ Parent | on HN ]