News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by fsh on Monday July 10, 2023 @01:55AM (#36662614)
> I had this working with multiple X11 servers 20 years ago.

People want to move windows between their screens.

The lack of proper HiDPI support was really starting to become a problem when trying to run Linux on a laptop that isn't from the early 2000s. Fortunately, with wayland, it now seems mostly solved (at least in Gnome and KDE).

Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by srcthr on Monday July 10, 2023 @04:09AM (#36663392)
>People want to move windows between their screens.

Yes, you use he fact x is a network server and run each screen as a separate client.

Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by dontlaugh on Monday July 10, 2023 @05:29AM (#36663932)
Very funny.
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by j16sdiz on Monday July 10, 2023 @05:46AM (#36664043)
X11R6.4 had it with Xinerama extension, back in 1998.
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by vetinari on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:35AM (#36664384)
Xinerama came with the price of not supporting mixed DPI. It was logically a single screen, just with irregular shape, so all screens had to be same DPI (and bit-depth, but that's not an issue nowadays).
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by SAI_Peregrinus on Monday July 10, 2023 @12:20PM (#36668554)
Bit-depth is certainly an issue these days. I've got a 1920x1080 60Hz 8-bit/color 24" monitor and a 3840x2160 144Hz 10-bit/color 27" monitor. Different resolutions, refresh rates, color depths, sizes, and DPIs, on a very modern system.

X doesn't like this. Wayland works much better.

Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by Vilian on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:37AM (#36664403)
honestly explain to me, if it's work as perfect as you seen to say, why i never heard about it outside of openbsd, why any distro adoped it to resolve it Xorg problems