Re:Let the Internet Be Grimy
by tourmalinetaco on Monday July 10, 2023 @01:11AM
(#36662376)
Additionally, for a time the SSL Certificate Authority in Greece was threatening to remove their https:// certificate for “unspecified violations of some clause.”
Said clause being, “specifically”, clause 3.1 of HARICA Subscriber Agreement. Which can be read here: https://repo.harica.gr/documents/SA-ToU_EN.pdf
[dead]
Re:Let the Internet Be Grimy
by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Monday July 10, 2023 @04:56PM
(#36672848)
>institutions who defend the free internet should be opposing the censorship of kiwifarms
This argument is unsupported by your comment. What value does kf create? Far as I can tell it only destroys value with their trail of suicides and bigoted behavior.
> What value does kf create? Far as I can tell it only destroys value with their trail of suicides and bigoted behavior.
Even if that were true (and I don't think it is), freedom only for those who "create value" is no freedom at all.
Re:Let the Internet Be Grimy
by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Monday July 10, 2023 @08:29PM
(#36674998)
You obviously didn’t read the article I cited substantiating this fact.
Re:Let the Internet Be Grimy
by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Monday July 10, 2023 @04:53PM
(#36672808)
>ISPs are not routing to them
Distinction without a material difference. This is only slightly to mail delivery services refusing delivery to homes with aggressive animals. In this case it’s telecom operators not enabling violent criminals that could create liability if left unaddressed.
They're not just being refused service by hosting companies or the like, ISPs are not routing to them. That's new, and that's what I think is worth "planting a flag" about; it's not a newspaper refusing to print your articles, it's the post office refusing to ship your newspaper. If that's not being silenced then I don't know what is.