Re:“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis R...
by synergy20 on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:46AM
(#36654048)
neither does the IDE tools I feel, it's going to take a while, and Rust has been here for 17 years.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis R...
by aldanor on Sunday July 09, 2023 @04:00PM
(#36658287)
IDE tools like what? LSPs for Rust are on par / better than that of C/C++, partially because of language being stricter, no #include nonsense etc. Unlike C/C++, sane build system and dependency management system that are universally agreed upon actually exist. What exactly is "going take a while"?
Re:“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis R...
by estebank on Sunday July 09, 2023 @04:38PM
(#36658630)
I would assume debugger support. Rust is in a tough spot because a lot of code gets compiled away, and debuggers need to understand some Rust-isms for good experience, like enum support. I don't think this is an insurmountable situation, though.
Re:“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis R...
by c_crank on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:23PM
(#36660530)
People universally agree that replicating NPM's dependency hell was a good idea?
Re:“C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success” – Dennis R...
by Lapha on Sunday July 09, 2023 @04:48PM
(#36658739)
>it's going to take a while, and Rust has been here for 17 years.
Technically correct, but Rust was changing significantly from version to version prior to the 1.0 release some 8 years ago, notably the green thread runtime was removed.