News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tailwind and the Beauty of Ugly Code by Cyberdog on Friday July 07, 2023 @06:25AM (#36629664)
No, that sounds like a tangental problem born of inexperienced developers and/or poor communication.
Re:Tailwind and the Beauty of Ugly Code by imilk on Friday July 07, 2023 @01:23PM (#36635129)
There are many, many, many cases where communication is not possible because who is working on the code now didn't exist when it was written (unless you want to take the time to document out all of your CSS and hope that everyone who touches it follows that documentation exactly). A new team taking over, a new agency updating a website for a client that was made by another agency, a new developer being brought on, etc.
Re:Tailwind and the Beauty of Ugly Code by Cyberdog on Friday July 07, 2023 @06:24PM (#36639071)
Sure. That's not a problem exclusive to CSS, though, and I don't see how it's one fixed by allowing bad coding practices.
Re:Tailwind and the Beauty of Ugly Code by troupo on Friday July 07, 2023 @01:40PM (#36635382)
> No, that sounds like a tangental problem born of inexperienced developers and/or poor communication.

I've yet to see a single project to not devolve into a mess of class names. Not only that, but a mess of class names with significantly repeating boilerplate, intimately tied to specific elements.