Re:StackOverflow
by icebraining on Sunday March 04, 2012 @08:21AM
(#3662687)
That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:StackOverflow
by SideburnsOfDoom on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:42PM
(#3663483)
And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864