News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on StackOverflow. Parent comment

Re:StackOverflow by SideburnsOfDoom on Saturday March 03, 2012 @10:16PM (#3661832)
Falsely asserting copyright over bits of nature is OK for you then?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:StackOverflow by icebraining on Sunday March 04, 2012 @08:21AM (#3662687)
That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:StackOverflow by SideburnsOfDoom on Sunday March 04, 2012 @01:42PM (#3663483)
And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864
[ Parent | on HN ]