Would gladly pay more for a none nerfed version if they were actually honest.

The current versions is close to the original 3.5 version, while 3.5 has become horribly bad, such a scam to not disclose what's going on, especially for a paid service.

Oh, it's not too hard to see how the spend that Microsoft put into building the data centers where GPT-4 was trained attracted national security interest even before it went public. The fact that they were even allowed to release it publicly is likely due to its strategic deterrence effect and that they believed the released version was already a dumbed-down version.

The fact that rumors about GPT-5 were quickly suppressed and the models were dumbed down even more cannot be entirely explained by excessive demand. I think it's more likely that GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 demonstrated unexpected capabilities in the hands of the public leading to a pull back. Moreover, Sam Altman's behaviors changed dramatically between the initial release and a few weeks afterward -- the extreme optimism of a CEO followed by a more subdued, even cowed, demeanor despite strong enthusiasm from end-users.

OpenAI cannot do anything without Microsoft's data center resources, and Microsoft is a critical defense contractor.

Anyway, personally, I'm with the crowd that thinks we're about to see a Cambrian explosion of domain-specific expert AIs. I suspect that OpenAI/Microsoft/Gov is still trying to figure out how much to nerf the capability of GPT-3.5 to tutor smaller models (see "Textbooks are all you need") and that's why the API is trash.

True. The one that is referenced in that "ChatGPT AGI" youtube video, right?

the one from a MS researchers that has been recommended to all of us probably. Good video btw.