News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup... by halfjoking on Thursday July 06, 2023 @12:25PM (#36618435)
That is not anywhere in the injunction.

You are taking a statement about the climate created by overreaching government demands out of context. When a government repeatedly makes authoritarian demands, it causes widespread suppression outside the scope of the initial demands.

But that has nothing to do with the specifics of the injunction. Once again people should read it, and decide if anything in the injunction restricts legitimate government free speech. (it doesn’t)

Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup... by adfhbaidnioni on Thursday July 06, 2023 @02:41PM (#36620794)
Let's say I issue an injunction that forbids the ritual harvesting of adrenochrome from small children. Clearly that injunction does not restrict any legitimate activity. Does that make it a good idea?