Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by wongarsu on Thursday July 06, 2023 @06:32AM
(#36613842)
This is the norm in Europe. Filming a crowd is fine, making a picture of the Eiffel tower with people around it is fine, filming a specific person and publishing it without their consent generally isn't. "Generally" because obviously it gets more interesting in the specifics of when it is ok, but those are exceptions similar to how copyright has exceptions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by JustBreath on Thursday July 06, 2023 @09:59AM
(#36615871)
I guess that explains the distinct lack of public freakout videos from Europe.
Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by remix2000 on Thursday July 06, 2023 @12:20PM
(#36618343)
I think that's more related to the fact that most Europeans normally speak languages other than English.
Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by JustBreath on Friday July 07, 2023 @09:45AM
(#36631672)
A bit difficult to post them when they are illegal, no?
Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by remix2000 on Sunday July 09, 2023 @09:28AM
(#36654289)
Not at all actually. There is a constant stream of compromising material posted online in Europe. It's a huge problem actually, because it's notoriously hard to get such stuff taken down, as the authorities simply do not care.
Re:Ban on Recording Without Consent Is Unconstitutional, US ...
by randombits0 on Thursday July 06, 2023 @10:44AM
(#36616725)
βTHE TOWER ILLUMINATED
Controlled use
The various illuminations of the Eiffel Tower (golden illumination, twinkling, beacon and events lighting) are protected.
The use of the image of the Eiffel Tower at night is therefore subject to prior authorisation by the SETE. This use is subject to payment of rights, the amount of which is determined by the intended use, the media plan, etc.β
https://www.toureiffel.paris/en/business/use-image-of-eiffel...