MIT and Caltech are not Ivy League but even then I'm sure they have a lot of students who benefit from private schools, private tutors, and pricy college prep programs. What differentiates the ones who get accepted from the ones who don't?
That wasn't your claim:
> You're assuming that people who are admitted to Ivy League schools a) have higher IQs than average and b) have parents with higher IQs than average.
>What differentiates the ones who get accepted from the ones who don't? At Caltech and MIT?
Possibly the most meritocratic schools in the US?
Idk, .001 on your GPA or a single point on your SAT and AP scores? Or the fact that you didn't win an IOM medal or Intel Talent Search?
>Neither of these need to be true.
As George Orwell said, "One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no ordinary man could be such a fool".
Neither of these need to be true. It's a incestuous system where it's easy to believe that people of average IQ have been born into privilege for generations and succeeded only because of their family wealth and connections.