News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JavaScript Gom Jabbar by Aeolun on Monday July 03, 2023 @01:11AM (#36569166)
Rome for the win! It’s a thousand time faster than eslint and it does formatting too.

It doesn’t have as many rules, but you wanted to get rid of all the cruft anyway, so that’s a feature, not a bug.

Re:JavaScript Gom Jabbar by norman784 on Monday July 03, 2023 @04:41AM (#36570359)
What Rome tried to do it, is being all in one tool, linting, formatter, bundler, test runner, etc, but they got only the first two before running out of funding, now it's community maintained.

I want to migrate a project I have, but I fear that it will get abandoned and in the future I will need to migrate away from it again.

Re:JavaScript Gom Jabbar by Aeolun on Monday July 03, 2023 @07:57AM (#36571675)
Wut? When did they run out of funding? The last half year has seen two major updates. If this is the pace they set when run by the community I can totally live with it.
Re:JavaScript Gom Jabbar by whstl on Monday July 03, 2023 @10:26AM (#36573371)
I have no idea how true this is, but the source of the claim seems to come from here:

https://github.com/rome/tools/discussions/4302

"But in short, the company Rome Tools ran out of funding, so the core team of last year are no longer working on the project."

Of course this also seems to be second-hand information, as there is an "Anyone feel free to correct me" disclaimer at the end of the message above.

Re:JavaScript Gom Jabbar by shepherdjerred on Monday July 03, 2023 @11:41AM (#36574509)
I've head about Rome, but I've never tried it. My main fear there is that it dies like so many other dev tools with low adoption do.