News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by bryanrasmussen on Sunday July 02, 2023 @01:49AM (#36558603)
This is the same way that one weighs LSD that is on paper, unfortunately. Thus a lot of paper with very little LSD on it is worse than a little bit of paper with a lot of LSD on it.
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by funnymony on Sunday July 02, 2023 @04:06AM (#36559368)
Could you elaborate? Why is it so?
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by bryanrasmussen on Sunday July 02, 2023 @07:48AM (#36560543)
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by codetrotter on Sunday July 02, 2023 @04:26AM (#36559487)
Seems that at least parts of the US government has realised that carrier medium weight should not be used for LSD.

> In the case of LSD on a carrier medium (e.g., a sheet of blotter paper), do not use the weight of the LSD/carrier medium. Instead, treat each dose of LSD on the carrier medium as equal to 0.4 mg of LSD for the purposes of the Drug Quantity Table.

https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/amendment/488

Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by bryanrasmussen on Sunday July 02, 2023 @07:46AM (#36560531)
huh, ok, it seems like things have changed some time in the last 27 years https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1996/01/23/s...
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by codetrotter on Sunday July 02, 2023 @08:44AM (#36560957)
> brushed aside a U.S. Sentencing Commission rule establishing a uniform presumptive weight of 0.4 milligrams for all doses of LSD, regardless of the carrier.

Oof :(

Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by bryanrasmussen on Sunday July 02, 2023 @11:20AM (#36562252)
yeah, so now I wonder which it is. Of course it will also depend on the state I guess.
Re:Shifting views about psychedelic drugs require a new cate... by tl_donson on Sunday July 02, 2023 @05:21PM (#36565899)
400 μg per dose is still probably overestimating by quite a bit.