Re:Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
by xigoi on Saturday July 01, 2023 @06:37AM
(#36548669)
I didn't consent to anything, I don't have a Twitter account. I'm talking about people who do. And they often mistakenly think their content will stay on Twitter forever, so they don't need to back it up.
Re:Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
by jkaplowitz on Saturday July 01, 2023 @08:35AM
(#36549451)
Fair enough. By “you consented … when you agreed”, I really meant “one consents … when one agrees”, as is common in informal English.
Yes, it’s a mistake to rely on social media content remaining up forever, agreed. That’s separate from ownership. Backups are important even for data on a hard drive you physically own, since hard drives can fail or be damaged or lost.
Re:Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
by xigoi on Saturday July 01, 2023 @08:43AM
(#36549510)
Sorry, I don't think I've ever seen “you” used as a generic pronoun in a past-tense sentence, which is why I took it personally.
Re:Twitter now requires an account to view tweets
by jkaplowitz on Saturday July 01, 2023 @12:17PM
(#36551713)
Also fair - it’s possible that my choice of tense made that the only literal reading, but my point was intended as general and not accusatory.
It may seem weird weird to compare useful content to a used napkin, but hey, successful business founder stereotypes do quite often involve have an idea written on a napkin…