News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Terrible real estate agent photographs by reaperducer on Friday June 30, 2023 @01:34PM (#36538985)
He would use the same memory card and high end camera both during "stakeouts" for surveillance photos as well as listing photos for the homes he was selling.

This really surprises me.

I would have assumed that an FBI memory card used for taking surveillance photos would have all kinds of security and encryption on it for chain-of-custody purposes. Otherwise, the photos won't stand up in court.

The healthcare company I work for has cameras it uses for photos, and for HIPAA reasons those cards are encrypted and secured. They won't even mount on an unauthorized computer.

Re:Terrible real estate agent photographs by wpietri on Friday June 30, 2023 @02:45PM (#36540168)
Why would you say it wouldn't stand up in court? As long as the agent shows up to say, "Yes, I took these photos of real things that happened," that strikes me as the heart of the evidence.
Re:Terrible real estate agent photographs by reaperducer on Friday June 30, 2023 @04:40PM (#36541925)
Because companies like Canon sell multi-thousand dollar cameras and attachments to police agencies that are designed to make sure photographs can't be tampered with so that they're admissible in court. There can't be the possibility that a rogue cop altered a photograph, or the case can get thrown out.

It's why the cameras police departments use cost 5x more than the consumer versions.

Re:Terrible real estate agent photographs by wpietri on Saturday July 01, 2023 @09:49PM (#36557372)
I'm not sure "government agency buys expensive thing" is proof of actual need of said expensive thing. And even if it were, it's not clear to me that the need applies in this case.