News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TSMC Faces $70M Ransom Demand Following LockBit Cyberattack by hammock on Friday June 30, 2023 @10:30AM (#36535575)
> Surely, given the size of the demand, it is beyond the authority of TSMC to pay up, even _if_ they wanted to?

Think again. Companies try to hide it really well but million-dollar ransoms are paid all. The. Time.

Likewise with insurance payouts for kidnapping ransoms

Re:TSMC Faces $70M Ransom Demand Following LockBit Cyberattack by oxygen_crisis on Friday June 30, 2023 @10:47AM (#36535847)
A friend of a co-worker works for a contracting agency with services including incident response for data ransoms. He says their go-to tactic is to haggle with the ransomers to bring the ransom down to some fraction of what the customer paid them and then implying to the customer that they cracked the key.
Re:TSMC Faces $70M Ransom Demand Following LockBit Cyberattack by acer589 on Friday June 30, 2023 @11:03AM (#36536131)
That's what Garmin ended up doing. The group had sanctions, so they had to pay a British company.

https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/4/21353842/garmin-ransomware...

Re:TSMC Faces $70M Ransom Demand Following LockBit Cyberattack by lyu07282 on Friday June 30, 2023 @10:56AM (#36535986)
Assuming the security consultant and the ransom gang are even distinct people at all. IT Sec is such an incredibly shady industry.
Re:TSMC Faces $70M Ransom Demand Following LockBit Cyberattack by nanidin on Friday June 30, 2023 @11:06AM (#36536204)
Yes, though in the case I am most familiar with, making the payment was a big deal because the hackers were in a sanctioned nation, which makes sending payments there illegal. If I recall correctly they went through some intermediary but still made the ransom payment. Which goes against all of the annual import/export corpo training, but I guess they found a loophole.