News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by throwuwu on Friday June 30, 2023 @09:26AM (#36534454)
Appeal to authority isn’t interesting. Tegmark is a physicist and science communicator anyways so he doesn’t belong in your list.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by js8 on Friday June 30, 2023 @09:30AM (#36534528)
The PP is not appealing to authority, but making an argument against GP's claim that people are AI doomers because they are uninformed, arguing that many experts (presumably informed) are also AI doomers.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by skinner_ on Saturday July 01, 2023 @09:59AM (#36550189)
Tegmark has his name on a bunch of competently written AI papers: https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Tegmark%...

In each case, the first author is Ziming Liu, which is more impressive than Tegmark's last author (PI) position. But still, it's fair to call Tegmark an AI expert.