Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by pluijzer on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @04:44PM
(#36512328)
You could argue that U can be confused with V.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by mtlmtlmtlmtl on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @05:26PM
(#36512829)
A vaguely related historical tangent is that V and U used to be just two ways of writing the same letter in Early Modern English. Which I imagine is why W is named as "double U" in speaking.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by jabbany on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @06:20PM
(#36513444)
This is also interesting since in French (and I think Spanish?) W is (correctly) called "double V"
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by namtab00 on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @07:32PM
(#36514211)
In Romanian and Italian too.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by mtlmtlmtlmtl on Thursday June 29, 2023 @03:50AM
(#36517629)
Same thing in Norwegian. But W is also not really a part of Norwegian orthography, it's just kind of there in the alphabet anyway. Only useful for names and maybe a couple loanwords.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by EGreg on Thursday June 29, 2023 @01:51AM
(#36516832)
Same with B and V, P and F, SS and Z, etc.
It is why PH is F, for instance.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by TRiG_Ireland on Thursday June 29, 2023 @05:44AM
(#36518343)
That is indeed why w is named "double u" in English (and "double v" in French. And why it's a vowel in Welsh.
See more from jan Misali: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg2j7mZ9-2Y
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by dmurray on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @06:09PM
(#36513329)
5 and S seems more likely.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by quickthrower2 on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @06:45PM
(#36513715)
Fvck!