Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by rbera on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:45PM
(#36511620)
That explains it, I was very confused by what I assumed was self-censoring, since the comment didn’t actually clarify anything. I wish there was an accepted way to disambiguate asterisks from server side filters.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by macintux on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:50PM
(#36511656)
I assumed this was a riff on the classic bash.org transcript.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by Aeolun on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @07:47PM
(#36514371)
But we know there are no server side filters here. At least I never had any profanity censored by anything other than the Mk 1 brain.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by taberiand on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @04:28PM
(#36512132)
No obscenity filters, but there is a pretty good password filter I hear. For example, my password 'hunter2' will be all **** to you
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by 9dev on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @04:34PM
(#36512217)
Isn’t it nice how some traditions do stick around. It’s been a while, Cthon98!
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by redler on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @08:51PM
(#36514930)
Sadly, this is one of those things that, soon, if not now, only the olds will know about.
Re:Type-safe, K-sortable, globally unique identifier inspire...
by astrospective on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @10:31PM
(#36515634)
Like telling people asking for game cheats to use Alt-F4.
Guess that's a credit to the general civility of the community.