Re:The False Dawn: Reevaluating Google's RL for Chip Macro P...
by AndrewKemendo on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @10:53AM
(#36507339)
This isn’t “harsh” IMO, it’s science.
If you do low quality science (incomplete methods and no reproducibility), other scientists are supposed to use robust evaluation to refute your claims.
Seems extremely straightforward, people just don’t like being shown to be incompetent.
If you do low quality science (incomplete methods and no reproducibility), other scientists are supposed to use robust evaluation to refute your claims.
Seems extremely straightforward, people just don’t like being shown to be incompetent.