Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by jrflowers on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @12:51AM
(#36502456)
I believe that! I am curious as to how big the difference the power source makes for a machine that’s purpose-made to kick up particulate matter up into the air from the ground though.
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by ztrww on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @01:27AM
(#36502643)
Did anyone imply there was a difference (besides electric ones possibly being less powerful)?
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by jrflowers on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @01:31AM
(#36502661)
If you scroll up this thread you will see where the discussion began.
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by Fomite on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @01:53AM
(#36502793)
Purely anecdote, but my neighbor uses a gas leaf blower and we use an electric one, and our yards are broadly similar. The difference is notable.
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by jrflowers on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:12AM
(#36503344)
How?
The electric blower yard probably still has leaves on it.
I'm all for electrifying yard tools, but electric blowers still aren't anywhere near a high end Stihl or Husqvarna in performance.
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by Fomite on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @01:07PM
(#36509359)
We both kick up a fair amount of fines, but there's also a noticeable amount of fairly dirty output from the gas blower.
Re:The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
by comedowntous on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @03:54AM
(#36503604)
It's in that CARB report posted above: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/Health%20...
Compare Table 3 to Table 5. PM emissions from exhaust are on the order of 1 gram per hour. Whereas fugitive dust emissions, depending on the surface, are 100s or 1000s of grams per hour.
https://phys.org/news/2014-05-two-stroke-scooters-super-poll...