News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by messe on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @07:09PM (#36499975)
3500 of them trained GPT-3 in 11 minutes. That number is still worth remarking.
Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by reaperman on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @07:13PM (#36500013)
It’s remarkable that one of these could train GPT-3 in under a month. However, good to note that its the price is that of twenty 4090’s.
Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by ClassyJacket on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @08:14PM (#36500550)
Could it actually? Or do you need the memory size of thousands of them running in parallel?
Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by reaperman on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @09:44PM (#36501249)
Yes I worded that extremely poorly.
Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by cavisne on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @08:28PM (#36500658)
One interesting thing is if the model can’t fit into GPU memory (sharded across multiple chips) it would be much slower. So one chip would take more than a month.

That’s why these clusters are so valuable, even with Nvidias margins they are still cheaper than using less compute for longer.

Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by visarga on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @08:17PM (#36500581)
title says: "a massive GPT-3-based benchmark"

that means they might pass a few batches through a GPT-3 sized random init network and time it

Re:H100 GPUs Set Standard for Gen AI in Debut MLPerf Benchmark by layoric on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @08:37PM (#36500739)
GPT3 benchmark, as others have said this means it would be ~46 hours to train GPT, still impressive! Also, going by other comments here, ~3500 of these or 13-14 DGX GH200s at ~$10m each means we are talking about ~$135m worth of compute here. Still very impressive but holy hell that is a lot of money worth of compute hardware.