News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experiment: Cold emailing businesses by joseph4521 on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @03:53PM (#3649648)
There's another word for cold emailing, it's spam.
Re:Experiment: Cold emailing businesses by alaskamiller on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @03:57PM (#3649665)
It's spam if it's unsolicited and irrelevant.

It's opportunity if it's unsolicited and relevant.

Re:Experiment: Cold emailing businesses by nate on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @04:43PM (#3649846)
http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html

Unsolicited and Bulk is usually the going definition. If's it's a targeted, relevant, personalized email it starts to be not-spam.

And I'm definitely a proponent of cold emails. However I couldn't help also resonate with this from Banksy today:

https://twitter.com/#!/negativeneil/status/17468993380458496...

Re:Experiment: Cold emailing businesses by alaskamiller on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @05:12PM (#3649966)
Definitions don't change?

I'm realizing deeper into the tech world I go the more signals tossed in all directions my way. I don't see spam though, I don't see the viagra ads or the russian wives. That's a testament to Google, Mailchimp, and the bevy of email marketers.

But I still have needs, wants, and requirements for work, personal, or consumption. So rather I see relevance and irrelevance of all these things tossed me way. That's spam's inevitability.

That Banksy item is pretty old. I'm getting a slight chuckle that an Instagram shot of a blog post posted on Twitter is getting play. Then I remembered I saw it on Tumblr last night.

The internet is just weird.

Re:Experiment: Cold emailing businesses by andrewfelix on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @06:45PM (#3650305)
In Australia it could qualify as spam, as it's promoting a commercial service. http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310513