This is a bit uncharitable. People only have so much capacity and interests.
Constantly analyzing the parts of life you don’t care about is exhausting.
For example: Most people would be absolutely crushed if they had to manage my disability the way I do. For me, it’s second nature. That doesn’t make neurotypical people less.
We’re the weird ones who enjoy being curious about a broad set of topics rather than just one or two. The curiosity that is so much a part of us is not necessary for much of life. We just can’t imagine living any other way.
I’ve only seen this be a common thing when people use (implicitly or explicitly) a weakly held premise as the basis for a strongly held conclusion, or one with a very high cost born by other people.
W. B. Yeats
* Immediately go with your gut instinct. * Appear 100% confident in your decision. * Avoid flip-flopping unless there would be catastrophic consequences.
I'm sure it works very well for keeping a group of people alive in deadly situations.
Because it's so persuasive, it can often be an effective way to get others to follow instructions in less grave circumstances, but when there's no time pressure, in the bigger picture it's a bad idea IMO.
So to the credit of those who profess strong positions, I think society is... unsophisticated enough that such strong positions are implicitly encouraged.