News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by Terr_ on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:46PM (#36475151)
> wasn't considered an objective fact by most.

Hold up, there's a HUGE difference between these two:

A: "Most people consider it an objective fact that Russia is a current geopolitical enemy to the US, it does some wacky shit, therefore if a foreign government is committing shenanigans there's a chance it's Russia."

B: "Most people consider it an objective fact that Russia has been somehow giving educational grants to US institutions with the explicit goal of installing a fifth-column of educators who will demoralize young US men with misandry."

Believing A does not imply B.

The parent-poster isn't being vague because the answer is obvious-and-accepted... they're being vague because they want to push the "foreign enemies in our colleges" meme without giving the audience any handles for critical-thinking.

Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by mistermann on Monday June 26, 2023 @10:41AM (#36480226)
* * *
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by akomtu on Monday June 26, 2023 @08:15PM (#36487550)
That's a shallow understanding of my message. I said that it's the dogma that corrupts minds and makes otherwise reasonable people do wicked things. Who created the dogma is a secondary question, for the US has plenty of enemies. In the near future we'll see how dogmas will become more elaborate, more oppressive, and it's the war of dogmas that will be central to future wars.