News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Making sense of the EU’s fight for user-replaceable smart... by croes on Sunday June 25, 2023 @06:33AM (#36466752)
They cookie banners are the fault of the website owner. They did this on purpose so the users would blame the laws.

Could have simple valued the Do-Not-Track flag but they didn't want to.

Re:Making sense of the EU’s fight for user-replaceable smart... by nonethewiser on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:34AM (#36468556)
If thats true then their competitors will gladly not ask for permission and enjoy higher user satisfaction and the banners will disappear due to that long term.

But we all know thats bullshit and the law actually did cause this.

Re:Making sense of the EU’s fight for user-replaceable smart... by kaba0 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:54AM (#36468794)
It’s almost like “the user will choose the best product” is bullshit. It has never been true, people are not rational agents, otherwise marketing wouldn’t work at all.

The best we have is to define small markets with strict regulations - within that some competition can happen that will tend to raise better products.

Re:Making sense of the EU’s fight for user-replaceable smart... by Timon3 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @03:01PM (#36471488)
Especially since it's not like there is a manufacturer for every cell of the feature matrix. Every single option has its downsides, and the optimal option most likely doesn't exist.
Re:Making sense of the EU’s fight for user-replaceable smart... by croes on Sunday June 25, 2023 @11:08AM (#36468988)
All these sites make money from tracking, if they back out once the customers would knew they get screwed.

And not all websites have banners