News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Free Soloist Who Fell to Earth by goodgrieving on Sunday June 25, 2023 @03:27AM (#36465784)
There’s no bright line. You’re just saying “my understanding of risk is correct, and yours is not”.

As an example, driving is a very avoidable risk. Owning or spending significant time around pool, too, especially with small children. Nevertheless many would say these are “everyday risks”.

Re:The Free Soloist Who Fell to Earth by Simon_O_Rourke on Sunday June 25, 2023 @03:29AM (#36465792)
Wearing a seat belt, of attaching a safety rope isn't some subjective gray area of risk though.
Re:The Free Soloist Who Fell to Earth by detourdog on Sunday June 25, 2023 @07:05AM (#36466935)
A seatbelt wearing is very similar to sitting in a the seat of a car. Using ropes is very different from no ropes. Rope failure is probably more common than seatbelt failure so the safety margin difference may not be as great.
Re:The Free Soloist Who Fell to Earth by fullspectrumdev on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:08AM (#36468328)
If your rope fails while climbing, it’s almost always user error (using the wrong gear, using damaged gear, risky placements, etc).
Re:The Free Soloist Who Fell to Earth by skeeter2020 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:10AM (#36468338)
What about having airbags? or driving a bigger car than everyone else? or not driving faster than 15, 30, 55, 70? Or not driving at night? Or in the rain or snow?

I always wear a setbelt and when I climbed was roped in, but to claim these generally acceptable risk mitigation techniques aren't subjective is just claiming your beliefs are everyone's beliefs. That's not true.