News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by andrewflnr on Saturday June 24, 2023 @01:03PM (#36460496)
The whole exercise specifically asked us to ignore context, "common sense", etc. If we were supposed to consider an exception for park services, it would have been explicitly stated.

Of all the forums for an insistence on rigidly, literally following rules to make people's heads explode, HN is not exactly the most surprising, but it is one of the funniest.

Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by paulclinger on Saturday June 24, 2023 @04:49PM (#36462533)
To me that's precisely the point: since vehicle itself is not defined and is a subject to interpretation, excluding emergency services is less of a problem than carving out an accurate boundary around what is or is not a vehicle.