Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”
by hunter2_ on Saturday June 24, 2023 @11:38AM
(#36459594)
That's absurd generally, but for purposes of this rule specifically, I think it works out totally fine, yes. Because if you replace the human jumping with a vehicle jumping (being that the rule is regarding vehicles, not humans) then the answer to the question of whether a violation has occurred is "yes" -- repeated violations does not matter when answering. For flying vehicles, only taking off or landing in the park is a violation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”
by fragmede on Saturday June 24, 2023 @05:28PM
(#36462798)
How about hovering? at what height does it become not the park? 10 centimeters above the park is one thing and space is at 100 kilometers, but there's a lot of room in between those for disagreement.
At what point is a helicopter hovering above the park in violation?
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”
by zeroimpl on Saturday June 24, 2023 @09:46PM
(#36464439)
This is why you need a lawyer familiar with the local regulations, which clarify these things. Thus this test is invalid because there should be an “there is not enough information to answer” answer.