Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”
by apricot on Saturday June 24, 2023 @08:21AM
(#36458068)
> but the obvious intent of the sign couldn't be clearer
There is no sign. Nowhere in the question does it mention a sign.
What the question does say, however, is this: "please answer the question of whether the rule is violated (not whether the violation should be allowed)."
Which is pretty much the opposite of what you conclude.
There is no sign. Nowhere in the question does it mention a sign.
What the question does say, however, is this: "please answer the question of whether the rule is violated (not whether the violation should be allowed)."
Which is pretty much the opposite of what you conclude.
Interesting.