News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by AnthonyMouse on Saturday June 24, 2023 @03:53AM (#36456552)
> No, it's not assuming, it's interpreting based on prior experience in communication.

It's assuming the intent without sufficient context to know what it actually is. Because very little context was provided. And the context that was provided strongly implied that the rule was important.

> Then the sign would mention that, simple as that.

We don't even know if there was a sign. None of that was specified.

Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by Etherlord87 on Saturday June 24, 2023 @04:36AM (#36456751)
> And the context that was provided strongly implied that the rule was important.

You're assuming that.

Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by hgsgm on Saturday June 24, 2023 @10:32AM (#36459003)
No, they were interpreting based on prior experience in communication.