News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”. Parent comment

Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by Qwertious on Saturday June 24, 2023 @01:14AM (#36455786)
>But that wasn’t absolute - the non-functional tank was, in my mind, quite obviously a vehicle, and so was prohibited.

Was, or is? The non-functional tank was a vehicle, but is currently a non-functional lump of steel and is thus no different to a statue. A statue is obviously not a vehicle, and a statue of a car is still not a vehicle.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by lostlogin on Saturday June 24, 2023 @02:36AM (#36456180)
How was the tank moved though?

Seems unlikely to have been pushed by people.

“Matthew, head of an organization of WWII veterans, puts a non-functioning WWII-era tank into the park as a war memorial.”

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by sethammons on Saturday June 24, 2023 @05:32AM (#36457092)
Not relevant. Assembled there and welded the moving parts. Doesn't matter. Is it a vehicle? No, it is a statue / art installation.
[ Parent | on HN ]