Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by bhtru on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:39PM
(#36437606)
What would be worse a catastrophic collapse deep down in the sea or a sudden depressurization high above in the sky around the Armstrong limit?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by Maxion on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:40PM
(#36437627)
The latter clearly as you’d definitely have a longer time of being conscious.
Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by accrual on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:52PM
(#36437814)
One would survive at the Armstrong limit for much longer indeed:
> Exposure to pressure below this limit results in a rapid loss of consciousness, followed by a series of changes to cardiovascular and neurological functions, and eventually death, unless pressure is restored within 60–90 seconds. [0]
Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by belltaco on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:45PM
(#36437710)
The pressure difference between complete vacuum and sea level is one atm. At the depth of the titanic, the difference is about 375 times that.
Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by dogma1138 on Thursday June 22, 2023 @05:13PM
(#36439095)
Implosion at 400 atm probably takes a fraction of a second, with catastrophic decompression of 1 atm you’ll be conscious probably for about a minute.
Re:Titan Submersible Suffered Catastrophic Failure: Debris F...
by LorenPechtel on Thursday June 22, 2023 @05:25PM
(#36439226)
Above the Armstrong limit you're looking at 9-15 seconds of useful consciousness. (The time you are conscious enough to take actions to save yourself.)
When a deep sub implodes you're going to be hit by water moving at the speed of sound in said water (1,500m/s, considerably faster than in air.) That's far above the speed of nerve impulses, there's no way a pain signal could reach the brain before there isn't a brain left to get the signal.