Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by brutusborn on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @10:24PM
(#36413612)
The difference is scale and ability to measure risk. We know how to make chicken safe and a lot of people eat it, so regulation works well.
For subs, it is a tiny number of people and risks are nearly impossible to assess.
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by sn41 on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @10:26PM
(#36413630)
Yeah, I agree to that. It is a bit avant garde, so people signing up must know that it is more miss than hit, so buyer beware.
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by Aeolun on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @01:29AM
(#36414717)
> risks are nearly impossible to assess
We have subs that have been touring the oceans for several decades, so we have a pretty good idea of what is unsafe and what works.
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @04:33AM
(#36415944)
> risks are nearly impossible to assess
this is total fabrication, we have submarines for 200 years. WW1 german u-boats were safer than this piece of crap
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by brutusborn on Thursday June 22, 2023 @07:09AM
(#36430371)
We’ve had subs, but not mini subs that go to 4km depths.
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by ClumsyPilot on Thursday June 22, 2023 @09:30PM
(#36441682)
We sent a mini sub to explore the deepest point on earth 60 years ago.
Re:Submarine missing near Titanic used a $30 Logitech gamepa...
by brutusborn on Saturday June 24, 2023 @02:00AM
(#36455988)
Im aware of that, just wanted to clarify that we haven’t had deep mini subs for 200 years.
Regulations do make our life smooth, even if there is a tendency to go overboard.