News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PostgreSQL reconsiders its process-based model by giraffe_lady on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @05:34AM (#36401652)
I'm not the person you asked and I don't have any particular knowledge of postgres internals.

Experience with other systems has taught me that in a system that's been in active use and development for decades, entanglement will be deep, subtle, and pervasive. If this isn't true of postgres then it's an absolute freak anomaly of a codebase. It is in other ways, so it's possible.

But the article mentions there being thousands of global variables. And Tom Lane himself says he considers it untenable for exactly this reason. That's a very good reason to think that it will require that many changes imo.

Re:PostgreSQL reconsiders its process-based model by h0l0cube on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @08:57AM (#36403326)
> that many changes

The 'that many changes' in question is a complete rewrite. Many changes across many files, yes, but nothing even approaching a rewrite.

> I don't have any particular knowledge of postgres

Judging by their bio, the person you're replying to does.