We need more of Richard Stallman, not less

Re:We need more of Richard Stallman, not less by p4bl0 on Monday June 19, 2023 @09:13AM (#36390692)

You seem to be missing the point. It is about diversity of thought that I'm talking here. The FSF refused people based on them wanting to be able to disagree with RMS, or to continue to work with local free software groups that at some point criticized RMS return to the FSF board based on how it was orchestrated for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need more of Richard Stallman, not less by stavros on Monday June 19, 2023 @10:34AM (#36391495)

Yeah, I was going to ask what you meant, you may want to edit your comment to reword it as "dissent" or "diversity of opinion".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need more of Richard Stallman, not less by p4bl0 on Monday June 19, 2023 @10:36AM (#36391529)

I cannot edit it anymore, sorry :/.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need more of Richard Stallman, not less by stavros on Monday June 19, 2023 @10:55AM (#36391770)

That's ok, hopefully this chain is high enough that people will see.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We need more of Richard Stallman, not less by pydry on Monday June 19, 2023 @12:51PM (#36393313)

People like who? Actual diversity of thought or somebody who worked as an "open source and diversity advocate" at Microsoft - i.e. people who would water down the FSF?

[ Parent | on HN ]