Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by RobotToaster on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:21PM
(#36371610)
So we're back to building company towns?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by Keegs on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:33PM
(#36371747)
I wouldn’t be shocked if they came back. It’s so hard to build that being a large company gives you both the opportunity and incentives. It’s normal to want a short commute. If you can offer employees an affordable place to live near your office, you might even get away with lower salaries: if the difference would disappear to rent anyway then it’s a wash, right?
Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by ninth_ant on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:32PM
(#36371727)
Well the actual towns aren't building much anything, so...
Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by efields on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:38PM
(#36371811)
Yeah and I don’t think it’s a terrible thing. It’s not a fantastic thing, but they are building public spaces and they are building affordable units. Sadly the best we can get at the moment.
Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by 0max on Saturday June 17, 2023 @12:54PM
(#36371975)
If you read Octavia Butler, you know where we're headed.
Re:Google gets go-ahead to build 153-acre Bay Area neighborh...
by tbrownaw on Saturday June 17, 2023 @01:52PM
(#36372572)
As long as they pay in real money rather than scrip and the local institutions don't discriminate based on whether you work for The Company, I wouldn't think it would be worse than any other new neighborhood in the same area.