And it sounds like you and I have no disagreement over what the point was, so where is the dishonest misreading? The phrasing of "fucking" around came from the author. Notice that the top posts on this discussion thread all have the same response. We all read the same point.
To repeat myself, going to the bathroom is productivity. Similarly, not paying for healthcare is externalization and it is not increasing the net productivity of the individual just because a hypothetical Amazon gets to pocket the difference. This bathroom anecdote just happens to be what Amazon thinks of warehouse productivity.
This guy is talking about being productive as an individual, he is not talking about how you can play accounting with your body and apportion productivity wins to Amazon while externalizing the penalties to yourself.
The bathroom anecdote is just a memorable illustration of Carmack's mindset: only work counts as work. Neither Carmack nor the author thinks you should avoid the bathroom or feel bad about pissing.
This is a self-aware blog post of a guy who worked with John Carmack and was able to use that to honestly assess his own productivity, and the amount of time he wasn't focused.