Re:Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
by WillPostForFood on Thursday June 15, 2023 @06:08PM
(#36347328)
There is little difference here between killed and sold. Squarespace charges 66% more per year for .com domain, so it is going to make sense to transfer out for most people. Same result as if Google killed it, just a slightly longer window to go through the hassle of transferring.
Re:Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
by CameronNemo on Thursday June 15, 2023 @06:16PM
(#36347405)
For stuff like stadia, which has no real identical products, a transfer would indeed be nicer.
But the whole sell of the google domains product is that you are getting a domain from Google. If it is no longer from google, the product is largely indistinguishable from those from other large cloud providers like Cloudflare or AWS (or more boutique or focused offerings like Porkbun and Namecheap).
Re:Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
by lozenge on Thursday June 15, 2023 @06:13PM
(#36347377)
I mean, they're domains, you can't kill them.
This is like saying Photos isn't killed because they didn't delete old photos when you exceed your new low quota.
Re:Alphabet selling Google Domains assets to Squarespace
by resolutebat on Thursday June 15, 2023 @06:47PM
(#36347822)
That's very different from "killed".
Because it's not being killed, it's being transferred to another company. (If this reporting is correct.)
Which is something to celebrate, not criticize. With Reader/Stadia/etc., wouldn't users prefer that it had been transferred rather than killed?