News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Quake's lightning gun bug explained by JohnFen on Thursday June 15, 2023 @12:16PM (#36342748)
> I think Carmack very easily has a place amongst the pantheon of programming gods, whether you measure by 'brilliance' (whatever that means) or impact.

I guess? I don't know. There are so many programmers that have had a much greater overall impact and such than Carmack has (which in no way takes away from Carmack's accomplishments!) that I find it hard to say either way.

That's part of why I think trying to rank people is a bit strange. I doubt that there is even much consensus on what it takes to be a "programming god" in the first place.

But I do agree that Carmack is great!

Re:Quake's lightning gun bug explained by pdntspa on Thursday June 15, 2023 @06:32PM (#36347614)
Like who? I can think of Brian Kernighan, Dennis Ritchie, Linux Torvalds, Steve Wozniak, Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Richard Stallman, Edsger Dijkstra, Bill Gates, John Carmack. Maybe Alan Turing. With the exception of the real OG's I think Carmack fits in that list quite nicely.
Re:Quake's lightning gun bug explained by pillefitz on Friday June 16, 2023 @01:31AM (#36351807)
..and hundreds or thousands of others, that signed some NDA, worked on e.g. mission-critical systems (where bugs as the ones discussed here would cost you your job) and who never got to show their work, which is OP's point.
Re:Quake's lightning gun bug explained by Eisenstein on Friday June 16, 2023 @06:28AM (#36354263)
I mean, if you are going to be culturally impactful, I think the most important prerequisite is that you are allowed to talk about what you create...
Re:Quake's lightning gun bug explained by pillefitz on Sunday June 18, 2023 @06:12AM (#36378841)
Agreed, but then we should differentiate between "best" and "most famous"