Germans beat Tesla to autonomous L3 driving in the Golden State

Re:Germans beat Tesla to autonomous L3 driving in the Golden... by BoorishBears on Saturday June 10, 2023 @08:51PM (#36276905)

Teslas with FSD are disengaging all the time. And even worse, it's not always FSD initiating: often times it's FSD not realizing it's about to do something wrong, the humans take over, and then them brushing it off as "well it's a beta" or "I bet it would have gotten it but I wasn't so sure".

Getting to a point where Mercedes can guarantee their system will correctly initiate disengagements and do so with a 10 seconds of response time while putting the liability on themselves is a massive leap of anything Tesla has ever put out.

Again, this is what happens when you have literally no clue how the space works (and then turn around and accuse people of FUD.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Germans beat Tesla to autonomous L3 driving in the Golden... by ncr100 on Monday June 12, 2023 @01:02AM (#36288639)

Yup Mercedes should be applauded for accepting liability.

Tells me what I want to know about which system is safer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Germans beat Tesla to autonomous L3 driving in the Golden... by bboygravity on Thursday June 15, 2023 @01:12AM (#36336668)

Tesla's with the FSD option (with or without FSD engaged) are crashing less than any other car.

Yet, according to you that is somehow a bad thing (dangerous?) or worse han some other brand. Which again, is factually untrue afaik.

This reasoning still makes no sense at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]